Competitors of casino cheating devices

Roulette cheating device device comparison. Features alone give you an idea of the sophistication of devices.

 

If you intend to cheat to win at roulette, you should ensure the device you use is the best available. You want to win at roulette, not lose money - unfortunately most devices can only beat very rare old or physically flawed roulette wheels. There are many different roulette cheating devices available. Of course each vendor claims to have the most superior device. So how do you know the truth? Thorough research. Your thorough research should not include reviews on forums or throughout the Internet, because false positive testimonials are frequently published by some vendors, who also publish false negative reviews of their competitors. Keep in mind the business of roulette computers is no different to gambling systems - there are countless manipulative and dishonest vendors that will tell you anything to "get the sale". There are very few honest people in this industry.

 

If you intend to cheat roulette, it makes sense to use the best device money can buy. Most devices are scams, and only lose you money instead of profiting you.

 

There are numerous other roulette computers available, all of which we have and know to be ineffective and very simplistic. Some we purchased, and some we were sent for free by unhappy purchasers. Neither of our competitors have our device, contrary to their false claims - even if they did, they would not be supplied with the access codes to load it. It is not unexpected that competitors will lie to protect their interests though.

 

Don't rely on claims that demonstrations can be provided because they don't actually expect you to visit. Beware of very cleverly manipulated data and so-called proof. There are a number of roulette computers on the market and we can say with utmost confidence, our devices are by far the most superior with regards to accuracy, covertness, and practicality. This is why we are able to offer our 200% money-back guarantee and $100,000 challenge.

 

Image right: When determining which device you should buy, one option is to see them compared to our device. We regularly conduct public demonstrations of both ours and competing devices (namely Mark Howe and Forester). Shown right are two competing devices being demonstrated publicly. On every occasion we have demonstrated competing technology, the accuracy rates were close to random.

 

 

Identifying a scam device without needing to buy:

As part of the development of our own technology, we acquired and tested every other device available. Some of them we purchased ourselves, and some we were sent to us for free by unhappy purchasers - every device was either a scam, or the seller blatantly lied about the effectiveness of their device. Unfortunately, cheating device sellers are usually no different to most roulette system sellers - very dishonest and manipulative.

 

The most common "proof" of effectiveness provided by roulette computer sellers is a video demonstration. However, videos are very easy to manipulate. Below are common tricks used by fraudulent device sellers:

• Raw predictions only are shown: raw predictions are when the seller conducts a demonstration, then presents a "scatter chart". The scatter chart's purpose is to display how far the ball is landing from the actual predictions. Computers use such scatter charts to "tune" predictions. For example, if the ball is constantly landing -10 pockets (10 pockets anti-clockwise) from the "raw" prediction, to achieve maximum accuracy, the computer would need to adjust the predictions so they are -10 pockets from the "raw" prediction. But some sellers demonstrate their device giving only raw predictions, not "tuned" predictions as you would use in a real casino environment. The problem with this is the seller can display the scatter chart of "raw predictions", then simply claim their computer's edge is where the highest peaks are. This is highly deceptive and unacceptable because especially over a smaller number of spins, a peak in the scatter chart will inevitably form. It's like how out of 50 spins, you'll almost never get a perfectly even spread of 25 reds and 25 blacks. So if a seller only gives "raw" predictions instead of tuned predictions, almost certainly the video is fraudulent. This would be obvious to the trained eye, but it may be a convincing demonstration to inexperienced players. Our 100 spin video shows tuned predictions, not raw predictions - just as would be done in a real casino.

• Inadequate and short demonstrations: even random predictions can have the illusion of being accurate if a test is conducted over too few spins. Generally a demonstration should be conducted over at least 100 spins - it minimizes the chance that success is due to mere luck, or the repeated filming of demonstrations until a profitable result is achieved. We conduct our video demonstration over two consecutive sets of 50 spins each (total 100 spins). The video is uncut between sets. This is to confirm that over two completely independent sets of 50 spins, the results are almost identical, as they should be with a legitimately effective device. Over each consecutive group of 50 spins, the scatter chart appears much the same, and the direct number hit rates for both sets are 1 in 16. The chances of this being merely coincidental are enormous, which is why we do it this way. Frequently, a fraudulent video is not conducted over a pre-defined number of spins, and the video ends abruptly without comment from the demonstrator - this is another sign that the seller has merely published only the most favorable spins to give the illusion of accuracy.

• Video is not clearly continuous: One seller conducts his entire demonstration over only 60 spins, and approximately "conveniently" half way through the video, the footage becomes badly corrupted. This is the hallmark of manipulated video footage where the seller has merely joined two independent but favorable segments of video footage. Another trick used is the wheel is first stopped from spinning, then two favorable independent segments of footage are joined. To demonstrate our footage is continuous and uncut, we place a lava lamp aside the wheel so you can always see "fluent" movement.

• Easy but unrealistic conditions: Some device sellers conduct demonstrations with very easy but unrealistic conditions. For example, they may use a heavy ball with minimal bounce to make spins more predictable, or they may place an object under the wheel to ensure it is not level, so the ball tends to fall at one point around the wheel more frequently than any other. One seller demonstrated his device to the Guardian Newspaper, although the article written by the reporter made it clear the demonstration was conducted on an easily beaten "tilted" wheel.

 

If you have been scammed:

Very frequently we hear from upset purchasers of other devices. Usually when they complain, the seller claims the device is simply not being used correctly - this is a convenient excuse for an ineffective device. However, to determine whether or not a roulette computer at least has a chance of being effective, you can try the following test:

 

Try predicting the same spin repeatedly on DVD, but use a different diamond as a reference point each time. Make sure the DVD player does not skip - do NOT use DVD players from your PC as they are notorious for skipping. If the computer has at least good enough algorithms (and hardware) to deal with errors from your clicks of the button, then predictions will be very close to each other, as they are in our Video # 2 (See Video Demos). However, if the computer is poor, you will see predictions are very scattered. For a computer to achieve ANY "potential edge", over 51% of the predictions should be on the same half of the wheel. However, for a cheating device, you should of course achieve much better results.

 

If you do this test and find predictions are very scattered, confront the seller with this knowledge, and demand a refund. Do not accept excuses because if a roulette computer cannot at the very least deal with errors with human clicking of a button, the computer cannot possibly be effective, and the seller would have been fully aware of this when they sold you the device. If no refund is given, we suggest report them to the authorities.

 

IMPORTANT: The above test is NOT an indicator of a device's overall accuracy. In fact we have acquired even simplistic devices that produce predictions in the same area on the wheel, but this doesn't mean they can beat modern roulette wheels. All this test does is verify if a device can deal with timing errors from manual clicking of a button, so the device at least has a chance of being effective. There is far more to achieving accurate predictions on modern roulette wheels than accurate timings.

 

Below is a chart of results and respective accuracy for this test:

 

Excellent:

All predictions within same 1-6 pockets

 

Average:

All predictions within same 7-12 pockets

 

Poor:

All predictions within same 13 - 18 pockets

 

Very poor:

All predictions within same 19 - 37 pockets

 

 

Shown right are the results of this test with our computer. Note that all predictions are within a 5-pocket arc. You can seen this test being conducted in Video # 2 (see Video Demos).

 

 

To assist you in your research, Click HERE to see comparison chart of other roulette computers.